TPO 31
In this set of material, both the article and the lecturer discuss the evidence that claims that Sinosauropteryx have had feather. While the reading passage firmly alleges Sinosauropteryx did not have the feather, the lecturer repudiates all of the reasons which have represented by the essay.
Firstly, the professor articulates that the decomposition theory is not true due to there were some other animals' fossil in that site, but non of them had these lines. As a result, these lines represents the functional structure of a living dinosaur. On the other hand, the text asserts that the these lines formed after the death of the animal, as result of the decomposition of the animal's skin.
Moreover, the lecturer avers that there is a chemical difference between the feather and frill. In other words, in the feather there is a chemical substance which is named beta creatinine which does not exist in the frill. So, it is crystal clear that these lines are related to the feather of the Sinosauropteryx. Conversely, the text contends that scientista cannot firmly conceds that these lines are related to the feathers of the Sinosauropteryx and they may related to some other parts of the animal.
Finally, the professor declares that the feather in the animals have other functions than fly and thermoregulation such as attracting the mate. For example, the male peacock have the colorful feather to temptates the mates. This finction of the feather is named display function. He states that some researchs have revealed that the feather of the Sinosauropteryx was in orange and white color which is probable that has the dispaly function. On the contrary, the text mentions that the usual fuction of the feathers are thermoregulation and fly, and both of these applications are not useful for the Sinosauropteryx. So, the existance of the feather in the Sinosauropteryx is useless.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...at claims that Sinosauropteryx have had feather. While the reading passage firmly alleg...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...at claims that Sinosauropteryx have had feather. While the reading passage firmly alleg...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ve the feather, the lecturer repudiates all of the reasons which have represented by the e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...s not true due to there were some other animals fossil in that site, but non of them ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he these lines formed after the death of the animal, as result of the decompositi...
^^
Line 13, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce of the feather in the Sinosauropteryx is useless.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13870967742 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01018907935 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461290322581 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8428807166 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299144639674 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108949382003 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678879922701 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176622628303 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465125463901 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.