TPO 22
In this set of materials, the reading stets that ethanol fuel made from plants is not a beneficial alternative to gasoline in the United stets. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First and foremost, the reading indicates that ethanol fuel as the same as gasoline releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere; hence, it cannot help global warming. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that ethanol fuel release CO2 in the atmosphere, but it produces by plants, and it means to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere. He explains that plants need carbon dioxide for growing and photosynthesis, so they absorb carbon dioxide from the air. As a result, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere released.
Furthermore, the reading argues that producing ethanol fuel can diminish animals food because most of the animals such as cows and chicken eat corn as food; conversely, what the professor believes is different. He points out that ethanol fuel is produced by cellulose that finds in cell walls of corn. Also, animals do not eat this part of the corn. Therefore, the food of animals will not be reduced.
Finally, according to the reading, ethanol fuel will not compete with gasoline in term of price. However, the lecturer believes that buy increasing production of ethanol fuel, the price of the ethanol fuel will be decreased. When people buy ethanol fuel, production of ethanol will be increased, so the price of it increases. Scientists believe that producing ethanol tree times more than now, the price of it will reduce 40%. Indeed, ethanol fuel can compete with gasoline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 31, column 134, Rule ID: BUY_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'by'?
Suggestion: by
...ce. However, the lecturer believes that buy increasing production of ethanol fuel, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24909747292 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63151390562 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516245487365 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1214034879 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9333333333 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491619662248 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173158998701 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890936289599 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270479607021 0.162205337803 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746011013831 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.