Both the author of the reading and the lecturer discuss if ethanol fuel produced from plants such as corn or sugar cane can be an alternative to gasoline. The author states that some critics have negative thoughts of ethanol fuel and give three reasons of support whereas the professor finds those reasons unconvincing.
First off, the reading claims that the excessive use of ethanol would not be helpful for global warming since it releases carbon dioxide while burning. The lecturer, on the other hand, points out that since the plants used in the production of ethanol fuel absorb carbon dioxide for getting nutrients, ethanol fuel does not cause environmental problems like gasoline.
According to the passage, a considerable amount of ethanol production would consume many plant sources utilized for other purposes like feeding farm animals. The speaker, on the contrary, refutes this by explaining that ethanol is produced from parts of the plants that are not eaten by animals so, food source available for farm animals will not be reduced.
Lastly, the reading believes that in case the government will stop helping ethanol producers in tax subsidies, its price will skyrocket. The professor disagrees with this claim. He explains that as more consumers buy ethanol, its production will also increase resulting in a decrease in its price. Thus, it can compete with gasoline on price even if the government cut off subsidies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if the government cut off subsidies.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, so, thus, whereas, while, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24568965517 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55495121547 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60775862069 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8312400006 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.7 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.524964766845 0.272083759551 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188811653959 0.0996497079465 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885914096174 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290689050547 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726805854684 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.