TPO 22: integrated writing task
The main topic of both the reading passage and the lecture is about whether ethanol would be a good alternative to gasoline or not. The author of the passage holds the view that replacing gasoline by ethanol is not a good option. However, the lecturer takes a radically different view due to some of the reasons.
First of all, The author explains that burning ethanol, just like gasoline, releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere which is a greenhouse gas and it resulted in global warming. Hence, it does not solve any environmental problem. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this notion by pointing out that growing plants in which ethanol is produced from them could absorb the released carbon dioxide resulted from burning ethanol. Hence, this plant would remove carbon dioxide and considering this facet using ethanol would be beneficial.
Secondly, the author claims that the main sources of ethanol are plants like corn which are also a main source of food for farm animals. Production a huge quantity of ethanol requires a huge proportion of corn currently grown in the United States. Therefore, this choice would reduce a substantial source of animal food. Conversely, the lecturer rejects this claim by explaining that a part of the plant which contains Seloloze is used for ethanol production. This part of the plant is not eaten by farm animals. Hence, production ethanol in large quantities would not restrict the food source of animals.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that if the government's subsidies for ethanol production removed, ethanol prices would be more expensive than gasoline. Therefore, it is not economical to replace gasoline with ethanol. On the other hand, the speaker refuses this assertion by pointing out that when the production of ethanol increased the prices would be cheaper. For instance, if the production increased to 3 times, the price would be lower by almost 40%. Hence it will be economical to use ethanol.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...takes a radically different view due to some of the reasons. First of all, The author ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 463, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...the price would be lower by almost 40%. Hence it will be economical to use ethanol.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11145510836 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59836995465 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486068111455 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5472285124 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7222222222 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.503148158242 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168144132795 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758367557339 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300607882219 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745107073503 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.