Regarding the passage, Ethanol fuel which is made from plants can not be a good successor for gasoline.
Conversely, the professor beileves that this is a geed alternative to vastly used gasoline. He provides three counter-arguments to delineate weaknesses of the presumption provided by the text which contradicts with feasability of ethanol fuel usage.
The first paragraph asserts, increasment of thanol usage does not help to one of the most important problems of the world; global warming. Because it still produces the carbon dioxide which is a greenhous gass. In contrast, the professor explains that emitted carbon dioxide from the Ethanol fuel will be absorbed by the plants which the fuel is originated from. for example the released carbon dioxide backs to new growing corn. This directly refutes the first reason of the text
Moreover, the second paragraph calims that, increasement in Ethanol fule can cause a shortage of plant sources for animals . Again the professor disproves this by suggesting that the ethanol fuel is made from cellulose which is not an edible composition in plants. Animals are not able to digest it, so there is no problem to convert special parts of plants to fuel
The last portion of the text proposes that price of ethanol can not compete with gasoline in future. because it is supportet by government now. Once again the professor denies the authors notion. He emphasizes that If people start to buy ethanol fuel more its costs will drop and people will be able to buy it more than ever.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... problems of the world; global warming. Because it still produces the carbon dioxide wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ants which the fuel is originated from. for example the released carbon dioxide bac...
^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly refutes the first reason of the text Moreover, the second paragraph calims th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... a shortage of plant sources for animals . Again the professor disproves this by s...
^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...f ethanol can not compete with gasoline in future. because it is supportet by government ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...an not compete with gasoline in future. because it is supportet by government now. Once...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ause it is supportet by government now. Once again the professor denies the authors ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ow. Once again the professor denies the authors notion. He emphasizes that If people st...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, still, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0431372549 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67707541696 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9172710633 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9230769231 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386074700786 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125574056477 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658485634572 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215707828142 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404591147602 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.