TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task
Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.
First, the increased use of ethanol fuel would not help to solve one of the biggest environmental problems caused by gasoline use: global warming. Like gasoline, ethanol releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when it is burned for fuel and carbon dioxide is greenhouse gas: it helps trap heat in the atmosphere. Thus, ethanol offers no environmental advantage over gasoline.
Second, the production of significant amounts of ethanol would dramatically reduce the amount of plants available for uses other fuel. For example, much of the corn now grown in the United States is used to feed farm animals such as cows and chickens. It is estimated that if ethanol were used to satisfy just 10 percent of the fuel needs in the United States, more than 60 percent of the corn currently grown in the united stated would have to be used to produce ethanol. If most of the corn were used to produce ethanol, a substantial source of food for animals would disappear.
Third, ethanol fuel will never be able to compete with gasoline on price. Although the prices of ethanol and gasoline for the consumer are currently about the same, this is only because of the help in the form of tax subsidies given to ethanol producers by the United States government. These tax subsidies have cost the United States government over $11 billion in the past 30 years. If the United States government were to stop helping producers in this way, the price of ethanol would increase greatly.
The topic is mainly about ethanol fuel subsides gasoline. The article refutes these idea becuase of three essential reasons,while the profesoor has an optemestic opinion on this reveloution of subsituiting them and he finds the articles reasons inconvinent and insufficent.
First, the article claims that by using ethonal the enviromental issues will still remain unsolved namely,global warming. While the lecturer blieves that ethonal won't increas global warming beacuse, ethonal is made of crops. Crops use carbon dioxide as their nutrient so they will remove co2 which traps heat in the atmposphere. Therefor not only growing crops for brreding ethanol is not harmful to enviroment but also it reduce the possible global warming caused by carbon dioxcide.
Adimtelly, the article state that by using crops for berguon of ethonal the quantity of foods for animals will be reduced. But the professor has the oppsite opinion, he beleives that he plants used for producing ethonal are those which aren't used for feeding animals,in addition he saids that ethonal can't be not only breeds from crops but also some specefic cells of plants too. So despite what article mention before there won't be shortage in animals nutrians.
Finally, the reading mentioned that although the pice of gasoline and ethonal is at the same rate currently, but in future when it will be the main supplement instead of gasoline, goverment can't afford to pay for it so its prie will goes up. On the other hand professor believes that in near future when gasoline is replaced by ethonal, the customer will pay for it and so as its avilabilty increased the price decends. by staticsticals studies he allged that by producing three times more than current amount of ethonal the price will be decreased by forty percent. thereby the prie won't be an issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this idea' or 'these ideas'?
Suggestion: this idea; these ideas
... subsides gasoline. The article refutes these idea becuase of three essential reasons,whil...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
... idea becuase of three essential reasons,while the profesoor has an optemestic opinion...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , global
...issues will still remain unsolved namely,global warming. While the lecturer blieves tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
...s not harmful to enviroment but also it reduce the possible global warming caused by c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...d for producing ethonal are those which arent used for feeding animals,in addition he...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ose which arent used for feeding animals,in addition he saids that ethonal cant be ...
^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...imals,in addition he saids that ethonal cant be not only breeds from crops but also ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...pplement instead of gasoline, goverment cant afford to pay for it so its prie will g...
^^^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...t afford to pay for it so its prie will goes up. On the other hand professor believe...
^^^^
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...avilabilty increased the price decends. by staticsticals studies he allged that by...
^^
Line 4, column 567, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thereby
...ice will be decreased by forty percent. thereby the prie wont be an issue.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, so, still, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58074924521 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5701440214 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.692307692 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258469642941 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920190827037 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627600291851 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144186879157 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256922001696 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.