TPO 22- Q1
In this set of materials, the reading states that there are severe critics over the use of ethanol as an alternative fuel for gasoline. However, the lecturer believes that one of the reasons the reading provided is not convincing, thus he gives some evidence to refute each of the author's reasons.
First of all, it is mentioned in the passage that using ethanol fuel has nothing to do with the reduction of the most severe environmental crisis: global warming. On the contrary, the lecturer states that using ethanol fuel will not make an increase in global warming. he explains that burning ethanol will release CO2 either, while the source of ethanol is related to corn. He continues to explain that by growing plants, co2 production would decrease, therefore the process of ethanol production contracts with the co2 production.
Furthermore, the author of the reading declares that the enormous production of ethanol from plant sources decreases the number of these plant for other purposes. On the contrary, the lecturer states that the cell wall of these plant is consist of cellulose which is not eaten by animals. Moreover, ethanols production is mainly focused on these components, so the available amount of food will not be reduced for animals.
Finally, the passage claims that the cost of ethanol production is high and it can not compete with gasoline price. To argue with this statement, the speaker asserts that the price of ethanol will compete with price gasoline, and it does not always need the support of the government. He explains that increasing the production rate leads to a drop in cost, thus it will be more available in the future. He also anticipates that the production rate will be 3 fold of today's rate, therefore its cost will be reduced by 40%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...not make an increase in global warming. he explains that burning ethanol will rele...
^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...es that the cell wall of these plant is consist of cellulose which is not eaten by anim...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97666666667 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60207395915 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496666666667 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5025968258 49.2860985944 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.846153846 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416900022281 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161243040182 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980516985719 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244856533742 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580297022105 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.