tpo 23

Essay topics:

tpo 23

The reading passage discussion is about diminished in the population of the yellow cedar and provides three reasons. However, the professor explaهns that the reasons mentioned in the text are not adequate.
First, the article states that the insect parasite; especially the cedar bark beetle are used to attack to the brak of trees and eat the wood and can damage the health of trees.On the contrary, the lecture declares that this type of trees is more resistance in front of the beetles in comparison with the other species. In fact, they have powerful chemical materials on their bark which is poisonous. So, when the beetle attacks to the tree, they will die with these chemical materials.
Second, the passage tells that the aggressive clawing of brown bears to eat the trees' bark that has an enormous amount of sugar which is compatible with the sugar of the wild berries that are the primary food for the brown bears. In contrast, the professor refutes this theory because the trees' population decline in the north-west in America in the off coats where there are not any bears. But they population decreasing in this area prove this fact that the bears are not a chief factor for our theory.
Third, the reading claims that the change in climate affects the time of root growth. In fact, the root grows in late of the winter instead of the first of the spring since they vulnerable to freeze and have this ability to weaken the health of trees. However, the lecture states the rate of decreasing in the number of the trees in high elevation is more than low elevation that proves this fact the root growth is not sensitive to freeze in the winter and weaken the health of trees.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on is about diminished in the population of the yellow cedar and provides three r...
^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mentioned in the text are not adequate. First, the article states that the insec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...wood and can damage the health of trees.On the contrary, the lecture declares that...
^^
Line 2, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will die with these chemical materials. Second, the passage tells that the aggre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...ofessor refutes this theory because the trees population decline in the north-west in...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are not a chief factor for our theory. Third, the reading claims that the chang...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is fact the root growth is not sensitive to freeze in the winter and weaken the h...
^^^
Line 4, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... winter and weaken the health of trees.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7138047138 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2942761931 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488215488215 0.540411800872 90% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9634621743 49.2860985944 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.272727273 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405432798757 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132431402015 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057794406512 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204770313216 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755813301319 0.0443174109184 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.