Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer.
Friends have an important influence on people’s life. They can make a pleasure time and unforgettable memories for us. In addition, the learning and the way we learn new things is really significant. However, I do not agree that people easily learn from their friends beside them. Here you can see my reasons.
First of all, people do not have enough time. Nowadays, people have to start working early in the morning and continue their work until late at night. Actually, by population growing, they need to make more money for clothes, foods, university’s tuition, insurance, etc. Because of that, they do not have any time to be with their friends. So, it is clear that if they do not have any close relationship with their friends, they do not have this opportunity to learn from them.
Second, modern technology in another noticeable reason. The new inventions such as computers, smartphones or televisions and the internet change people’s attitude toward the friends. In fact, people prefer to stay at home, unwind, and listen to different type of the music or browse on the internet and see the beauty of the world instead of talking and going out for walking with their friends. So, it is clear that there is a big gap between people and their friends which prevent people from learning from their friends.
On the other hand, some people think that the friends have positive effects on people to learn without difficulty. For example, in a group study students have a communication with each other. They can use from other members' thinking, idea, and lecture note. It helps them to reach to profound understanding toward the topics and materials in the class. Besides, it improves their performance in the class. However, I do not agree with this claim, because their friends do not have enough information and knowledge about the topics to teach them and help them to learn easily.
In conclusion, the lack of time, modern technology and useful educational books and videos can be considered the reasons that why the people do not learn from their friends more easily in comparison with other things.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, first, however, if, really, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95251396648 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65047886848 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513966480447 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7561865805 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4285714286 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0476190476 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09523809524 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285433115883 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943234744467 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113173958381 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189617683018 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726298210245 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.