Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer.
Friends have an important influence on people’s life. They can make a pleasure time and unforgettable memories for us. In addition, the learning and the way we learn new things is really significant. However, I do not agree that people easily learn from their friends who beside them. Here you can see my reasons.
First of all, people do not have a time. Nowadays, people have to start working early in the morning and continue their work until late at night. In fact by population growing, they need to make more money for cloths, foods etc. Because of that they do not have any time to be with their friends. So, it is clear that if they do not have any close relationship with their friends, they do not have this opportunity to learn from them.
Second, modern technology in another noticeable reason. The new inventions such as computer, smart phone or television and the internet change people’s attitude toward the friends. In fact, nowadays people prefer to learn and get the useful information and knowledge from these equipment’s which are really comfortable and persuasive. Also, these new tools are more trustful than the friends, because their information up to date every second. Hence, it is more helpful than the friends to assist people to keep the pace with modern technology and new discoveries.
On the other hand, some people think that the friends have a positive effects on people to learn without difficulty. For example, in a group study students have a communication with each other. They can use from other members’ thinking, idea, and lecture note. It helps them to reach to profound understanding toward the topics and materials in the class. Besides, it improves their performance in the class. However, I do not agree with this claim, because it is not necessary for students to be with their friends and learn from them. There are a lot of educational books and video which help them more easily.
In conclusion, the lack of time, modern technology and useful educational books and videos can be consider the reasons that why the people do not learn from their friends more easily in comparison with the other things.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, however, if, really, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93188010899 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69607754506 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50136239782 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9429804686 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6956521739 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9565217391 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.60869565217 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278563344214 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862069577712 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102202383021 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183853782836 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749536526647 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.