The reading and lecture reading and lecture both discuss declining of yelow cedar.The passage claim several hypotheses explayn this decline.Whereas, the lecture casts doubts on each claims by presenting opposing evidence.
First of all, the author states that diclining may be caused by insect parasites ike bark beetle. İt is mentioned that beetles kill yellow cedars by attacking cedar trees.This point is challenged by the lecture. She says that Bark beetles are powerful chemicals.Furthermore, she argues that bark beetle attack the tree that was already attacked.
Secondly, The passage points out that Brown bears can be responsible fort he yellow-cedar decline.
He notes the bears could destroy the trees by clawing at it to eat the tree bark. The lecture rebuts this argument. She suggests that bears cannot be responsible to decline yellow cedar.
She elaborates on this by mentioning that tree barks were in İlands, while there are not bears in ilands.
Finally, the author mentions that changing temperatures n North America could affect the decline.He is of the point that surface roots start growing in the late winter rather than in early spring. Also, roots are sensitive Therefore likely to suffer damage from partial freezing on cold winter. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that the temperature change according to elevation. She puts forth the idea that the temperature is warm in lower elevation and cold in high elevation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...e both discuss declining of yelow cedar.The passage claim several hypotheses explay...
^^^
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...ss declining of yelow cedar.The passage claim several hypotheses explayn this decline...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
...several hypotheses explayn this decline.Whereas, the lecture casts doubts on each claim...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...several hypotheses explayn this decline.Whereas, the lecture casts doubts on each claim...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... yellow cedars by attacking cedar trees.This point is challenged by the lecture. She...
^^^^
Line 2, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... She says that Bark beetles are powerful chemicals.Furthermore, she argues that b...
^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...at Bark beetles are powerful chemicals.Furthermore, she argues that bark beetle attack the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Secondly, The passage points out that Brown bears can be responsible fort he y...
^^
Line 6, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
... North America could affect the decline.He is of the point that surface roots star...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28879310345 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8077752956 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629310344828 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7421575703 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3846153846 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421341278718 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13649194805 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653735006699 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193303225211 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733482166034 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.