The reading passage states that there are an exciting finding of actual tissues by researchers in a T. rex leg bone and introduces three important discoveries. However, the professor in the listening considers these finding skeptical and opposes all of them.
First, the passage claims that the finding of soft, flexible organic materials inside the bone well represents a real blood vessel. Conversely, the professor refutes this point by stating that bacteria colonization in bone is prone to be the cause of the remains trace of organic substances. Thus, this is not the possible explanation of the finding.
Second, the reading mentions that there are some parts showed the presence of spheres that could be the remains of red blood cells. The professor contends this point by saying that these spheres are not red blood cells as it showed by another finding in some primitive animals. It can be reddish minerals.
Third, the passage states that scientists find the presence of collagen in the leg bone. The professor argues against this finding by stating that it is not possible because collagen does not last for more than 100000 years, according to recent finding. He points out that the collagen could have come from other sources such as scientists' skin.
All in all, the professor casts doubt on all of the reading points.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 42, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ll in all, the professor casts doubt on all of the reading points.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, second, so, third, thus, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06306306306 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51301296317 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.999783518 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4615384615 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315257005258 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112437687178 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859115993048 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154822422989 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089686349785 0.0443174109184 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.