The reading passage suggests the discoveries from the leg bone of T-REX can provide much information about the actual animal and include three results of the research prediction. On the other hand, the lecturer refused those points and casts doubt each of the author's idea.
First and foremost, the article states that the soft and flexible substance found from inside of the channel that located in the leg bone of T-REX can represent the real red blood vessels of it. However, the lecturer made a counterclaim to this idea by saying that this can be the remaining of the bacteria that colonized the channels once. According to him, the bacterias colonize the hollow and often leave organic material in where they live.
Secondly, the reading indicates that from the microscopic examination of the T-REX's inner bone, the researchers found little spheres that could be the remains of the red blood cells. Nevertheless, the professor argued that the same spheres also found in the fossils of other animals that found in the same place as the T-REX's. He also argued that those probably can be the reddish mineral, not the remaining of the actual red blood cells.
Lastly, the author of the passage claims that researchers predict that the leg bones of the T-REX contains a collagen. In contrast, the professor made a rejection to this idea by explaining that the collagen cannot last long 70 million years, it is improbable. Furthermore, he said the collagen only found from the recent fossils such as humans'.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage suggests the discove...
^^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...hose points and casts doubt each of the authors idea. First and foremost, the articl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98031496063 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50792345963 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531496062992 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5019801592 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372988415369 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137922900612 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096191383762 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2074988834 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686525162664 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.