tpo 24 Q1
In this set of materials, the reading states that the actual animal tissues provide more opportunity to deeply understand the structure of the animals. Meanwhile, the new discovery of a dinosaur brings this opportunity to broke the bone to study its structure. However, the lecturer believes that although we would like to know the reality, there are some skepticisms to this idea and gives some evidence to refute each of author's reasons.
First of all, it is mentioned in the passage that by breaking the fossilized leg bone, it was shown that there are some channels which may be related to the blood vessels. To argue with this statement, the lecturer says that soft material is not necessarily the blood vessels. He continues to explain that whenever a creature dies, the bacteria tend to exist nearby the empty spaces of the bones. Therefore, he states that these finding might be related to the residues left by the bacteria.
Furthermore, the author of the reading declares that the latest discoveries revealed the existence of spheres which may be the remains of the red blood cells. To extend the argument, the professor thinks that these fossils gather from different parts and it may not attribute to the red blood vessels. He thinks that it may be the residue of the minerals.
Finally, the passage claims that there are signs of collagen in the leg bones which proposed by the latest experiment of the researchers. On the contrary, the professor states that the collagen has never been found in any creature more than 1000 years. because this substance cannot remain a very long time. He also makes this uncertainty that the collagen, which is found recently, may be coming from the human resources, especially the skin of the researchers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...d in any creature more than 1000 years. because this substance cannot remain a very lon...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d in any creature more than 1000 years. because this substance cannot remain a very lon...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96283783784 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59735345652 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533783783784 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8199952514 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323411339567 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102901829911 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705105591666 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176349614223 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482227726549 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.