TPO 24 Task 1
The reading and the lecture are both about the discovery of a 70-million-year-old fossil of T.rex dinosaur containing actual tissues instead of minerals. The author of the reading feels that scientists explored this animal's leg bone and found remaining parts of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix. The lecturer challenges the claims made my the author. He is of the opinion that the outcomes of the experiment were skeptical.
To begin with, the argues that the fossil of leg bone included hollows in the bones where blood vessels were previously present. The article mentions that this result was the indication of a soft organic substance, which clearly presented the actual blood vessels. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims during decomposition some bacteria colonizes the hollows. Additionally, he says that the tissue might have been the soft residue left by the bacteria.
Secondly, the writer suggests that microscopic trial of inner bone discovered the existence of spheres, which indicated the remaining part of red blood cells. In the article, it is said that presence of iron in the spheres also confirmed that red blood cells were traced. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that reddish mineral could have been the cause of dark red color.
Finally, the author posts that collagen was found in the bone tissue. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that collagen can be found from the animals of 100 million years ago. He notes that the collagen might have been come from other source like human skin while researchers handling the bones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., red blood cells, and collagen matrix. The lecturer challenges the claims made my ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19465648855 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64125722519 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572519083969 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7593189097 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7333333333 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448922757426 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126313799634 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10477570188 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25301843883 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722113085419 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.