TPO 25
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that a set of clay jars were discovered in Iraq that they have 2200 years old. Some archaeologists believe that these vessels were used for produced electricity like batteries, but the reading provides 3 theories against this idea. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading point by pointing out the problem of each theory.
First, the reading indicates that archaeologists cannot find other materials and containers which belong to the vessels that they may produce electricity. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this idea by mentioning that these vessels had been discovered by local people, not by archaeologists. So, local people may not recognize the importance of other containers. Also, conductors may not interest for local people, and they may throw them away.
Furthermore, the reading argues that the copper cylinders as the same as the copper cylinders discovered in the ruins of Seleucia; hence, these vessels may have the same role as copper cylinders for holding scrolls of sacred texts; conversely, what the professor believes is different. She points out that probably these cylinders originally designed for holding scores, but it does not prove any things. Later, people understood that they could produce electricity if they used liquid and iron in these cylinders. Moreover, goods did not design for one purpose, people could adapt them for other purposes.
Finally, according to the reading, ancient people did not need electricity, so the vessels would have been useless for them. However, the lecturer believes that by touching batteries, it makes some shock to the human body, and people would not able to see this power. So, ancient people thought that it was a magic power. Furthermore, they used electricity for healing and reducing pains in muscles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: HAVE_CD_YEARS[1]
Message: This phrase is used with 'be': 'be 2200 years old'.
Suggestion: be 2200 years old
... jars were discovered in Iraq that they have 2200 years old. Some archaeologists believe that these...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39597315436 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68047717483 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536912751678 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5832250395 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386008764633 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119286869632 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845408811515 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220438503063 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059199043075 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.