TPO 25
The reading and lecture are about possibility of the electric battery's presence before approximately two thousand years ago. The reading states that these vessels found can not be battery. Lecturer challenges the claims made by the writer. She is of the opinion that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the author argues that there was no conductors near to the site, so absence of conducting wires which corresponds with battery refutes idea that vessels are battery. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She stated that those vessels were found by indigenous people but professional scholars. Moreover, she noted that these local people may not recognized wires and throw it away because they did not know it is valuable evidence.
Secondly, reading claimed that these stuffs probably was being used for purpose of scrolls since its shape is analogous to the shape of holding scrolls. However, the lecturer refutes this idea by mentioning inventors started using iron rods for scrolls after the time to which vessels relate. Additionally, she claimed that scrolls was not being used for only single purpose, so people might used it for battery after utilizing for scrolls.
Finally, reading remarks that archaic people does not need electric current since they do not have any device for which individuals employ battery. Nonetheless, the woman in the listening stated that it provided people to make mild electric shock, hence they deceive people by imitating as magician. In addition, doctors perhaps was using this to treat people as how it is used nowadays.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23046875 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52798967789 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57421875 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7964451127 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6428571429 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27174560604 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084594040919 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539300421247 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151499869019 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334917213681 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.