TPO 25 Integrated
The professor explains three arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the ancient clays which contained copper cylinder surrounded an iron rod. Some archaeologists are dubious about the cylinders application in electricity production, however, the professor has presented evidences to support electricity production idea.
First, the professor argues that these clay were found by untrained local people and and they might overlooked or even thrown out other objects like metal wires. So, the idea has been repudiated by professor.
Second, the reading passage asserts that the copper cylinders are highly similar to copper cylinder have been discovered in Seleucia that were employed for holding scrolls of sacred texts, thus, both of these cylinders might have had used in same purpose. On the contrary, the professor draws attention to the idea that early ancient scientist could able to produce electricity by mixing iron lodes and liquids. Furthermore, these cylinders' application could changed overtime from using for holding scrolls to producing electricity as battery.
Third and last, although reading passage claims that there were not any devices that replied on electricity, indeed, electrical devices ans tools, the professor believes that ancient doctors would use this electricity for mild shocking in order to release pain from muscles; the action that our doctor are doing now. In addition, this mild shock could introduced as magic power to people. Therefore, the professor rejects this hypothesis either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cylinders'' or 'cylinder's'?
Suggestion: cylinders'; cylinder's
...me archaeologists are dubious about the cylinders application in electricity production, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this clay' or 'these clays'?
Suggestion: this clay; these clays
...ea. First, the professor argues that these clay were found by untrained local people an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ay were found by untrained local people and and they might overlooked or even thrown ou...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cylinders'' or 'cylinder's'?
Suggestion: cylinders'; cylinder's
...n lodes and liquids. Furthermore, these cylinders application could changed overtime from...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
...more, these cylinders application could changed overtime from using for holding scrolls...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'devices'' or 'device's'?
Suggestion: devices'; device's
...lied on electricity, indeed, electrical devices ans tools, the professor believes that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'introduce'
Suggestion: introduce
...now. In addition, this mild shock could introduced as magic power to people. Therefore, th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, look, second, so, therefore, third, thus, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63265900148 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628205128205 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.1815249918 49.2860985944 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.6 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368394689189 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127026752814 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956865139681 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206994560802 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874427623544 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.