TPO 31 Integrated
The professor explains three arguments oppossing the points stated in the reading passage about the idea that Sinosauropteryx was not a feathered dinosaur in spite of other critics believes.
First, the reading passage states that fine lines would not indicate functional structures, in fact, those were formed after animal's death and decomposed into fibers. However, the lecturer sees that the lines are not fibers caused by decomposition of dinosaur's skin. Indeed, many other animals' fossils have found at the same place, suggesting that their functional skin structure have been well preserved without mentioned decomposition. Thus, we can hypothesize that Sinosauropteryx's lines might be feathers.
Second, the professor opposses the idea presented in the reading passage claims that such lines could be remains of frills rather than remains of feathers. She states that feathers are usually consist of proteins like beta-caroten while frills don't contain such material. Hence, this idea has been repudiated by the professor too.
Third, the reading passage asserts that animals employ feathers in functions like flying or thermoregulation. In contrast, the professor disproves the idea by claiming that feathers have had other applications beyond mentioned cases. For instance, peacocks use feather to attract their mate. So, as feathers of Sinosauropteryx were colorful, orange and white, they could use it as a tool in looking for an appropriate male. Therefore, based on aforementioned arguments, this idea is rejected either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...s. She states that feathers are usually consist of proteins like beta-caroten while fri...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...proteins like beta-caroten while frills dont contain such material. Hence, this idea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, look, second, so, therefore, third, thus, well, while, for instance, in contrast, in fact, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69264069264 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97006926597 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640692640693 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5781564688 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.153846154 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365317821243 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111720547543 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653052838227 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199738098929 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116350375686 0.0443174109184 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.