TPO 28 Integrated
The professor explains three arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about authenticity of Peary's travel to the North pole and reach it.
First, the professor argues that committee, which set up by National Geographic Society, was dubious because it consists mostly by Peary's friends and investigations about this issue took only two days. Also, National Geographic Society was invested in Peary's travel. Therefore, committee's verdict about Peary's travel is not trustworthy and it is biased.
Second, the reading passage claimed that Peary could able to travel such long distance in only 37 days. They states that as another explorer named Tom Avery could pass similar path in less than 37, it wasn't impossible to Peary to cover this path in mentioned time period. However, the professor states that Avery's journey was different with Peary's in some ways. Avery didn't bring food and other stuffs with himself and left them back in airplane. Furthermore, when Peary traveled to the North Pole he encountered unfavorable weather condition which makes things harder to do. So, based on aforementioned idea, this claim has been repudiated by professor.
Third, the reading asserts that photographs taken by Peary prove that he was in North Pole because sun's position was measured in a position that it was should be. In contrast, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that techniques which had been employed to measure the Sun's position was preciseness and we can not judge claims based on such evidences. Furthermore, the camera that Peary took pictures was primitive that negatives were faded more overtime, therefore, pictures were blurred, suggesting that Sun's precise position wouldn't be determine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
...uch long distance in only 37 days. They states that as another explorer named Tom Aver...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...d pass similar path in less than 37, it wasnt impossible to Peary to cover this path ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...fferent with Pearys in some ways. Avery didnt bring food and other stuffs with himsel...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 540, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
..., suggesting that Suns precise position wouldnt be determine.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30072463768 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62287561191 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7076777297 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.538461538 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395218411813 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141431101499 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720671241149 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236757022501 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265912695573 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.