TPO 26 integrated
In this set of material, the reading passage is about 3 reasons which support Zebra mussel' invasion is not controllable in the new habitat. In the lecture the professor disagrees with the reading passage's notifications.
First, according to the reading, being unstoppable of Zebra mussel's distribution via ships is important factor at developing this space at all of North America. However, the professor asserts that now the human's knowledge can help to solve this problem. For example, salty water can kill Zebra mussels in ship's ballast water.
In addition, reading passage mentions that the Zebra mussels' <span style="font-size: 19.36px; line-height: 31.944px;">population </span>increases because of two reasons: first, high rate of their reproduction and second, not being available any predators; But in the lecture the professor explains that birds eat Zebra mussels and prevent them from extra existence.
Last but not least, the passage believes that Zebra mussels as competitors have critical roll in decrease of planktons which are the common food for many freshwater fish species. As a result, they cause decline in fish's population. The professor declares even though they affect on planktons, but in contrast, Zebra mussels have positive roll in new habitat' food chain by providing more nutrient in bottom of ocean through their bodies' debries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ver, the professor asserts that now the humans knowledge can help to solve this proble...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...The professor declares even though they affect on planktons, but in contrast, Zebra musse...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, for example, in addition, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5980861244 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3028219819 2.5805825403 128% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.641148325359 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.1139314808 49.2860985944 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414615690474 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161825575741 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843582889754 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229951072486 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663961183713 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.