tpo 28
Question: Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Peary's North Pole expedition
The listening and the reading materials have a debate on the statement "if Peary really reached the North Pole". The penman puts forward 3 main hypothesis, which are refuted by the following orator.
First of all, the writer suggests that Natural Geographic Society 'committee has approved the accuracy of Peary's discovering. On the contrary, the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, the member of this committee were Peary's friends and found his trip. Furthermore, they are not eligible for judging this travel.
The second point offered by the author is that similar program has down by a British explorer proof the above discovery because recent try has done in less days that 37 days makes Peary's travel possible. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt on this assumption by saying that these two trip are not comparable. Since Tom's food carried through airplane and air conditions was different for them, British 's trip may perform faster.
Last, the reading passage proposes that measuring the shadows' in Peary's photographs and evaluating them with sun condition at North Pole shows that these picture are real. However the lecturer holds a different view. She explains that the quality of picture has deteriorated during the time. As a result, these photos are not reliable for evaluating the shadow's highs. In addition, In Peary's time there were not exact measurable tools for determining precise dimensions's of shadows.
In all, the ideas mentioned in the speech counter the opinions in the text according above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hypothesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'.
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
...e'. The penman puts forward 3 main hypothesis, which are refuted by the following ora...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 152, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...iscovery because recent try has done in less days that 37 days makes Pearys travel p...
^^^^
Line 13, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...Pole shows that these picture are real. However the lecturer holds a different view. Sh...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, second, so, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25490196078 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55328150498 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650980392157 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5092033439 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28984625227 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074082787847 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076071546146 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128739166819 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701341749775 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.