TPO 33
The listening and the reading materials have a doubt on application of carved stone balls which are founded in Scotland. The writer puts forward 3 main hypotheses, which are refuted by following speaker.
Firstly, the writer suggests that these balls are used as a tool for defending and fighting against enemies or hunting goals. In addition, some holes on them represent that ancient people hold balls through these sites easier. while the speaker view this issue from an opposite view. According to her, it is not seen any fracture or damage on balls, and they are really well preserved. If they were used as a weapons, they would have some signs of crack or fracture on them.
The second preposition offered by the writer is that the balls may perhaps use as a standard device for weighting foods or other related stuffs, However, the speaker casts doubt on this assumption by saying that different kind of stones are used for making those balls. As a results, they have various densities and are not equal in weight. So, it is not advisable to think that they were applied for measuring quantities of crops.
Last, the reading proposes that the ornamented balls may had a social aim instead of practical usage and detected important level of their owners. On contrary, the professor holds an opposite view. She claim that many of these balls have really simple designs and are not found in any grave of high ranking people. Thus, it is not possible that they were used as a tool for distinguish the community level.
Overall, the ideas mentioned in the listening opposes the ideas in the reading passage in that carved stone balls were not applied as weapon, measuring tool, or representing social level of their owners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... hold balls through these sites easier. while the speaker view this issue from an opp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... hold balls through these sites easier. while the speaker view this issue from an opp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m an opposite view. According to her, it is not seen any fracture or damage on ba...
^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a weapon' or simply 'weapons'?
Suggestion: a weapon; weapons
...ly well preserved. If they were used as a weapons, they would have some signs of crack or...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'perhaps'.
Suggestion: may; perhaps
...offered by the writer is that the balls may perhaps use as a standard device for weighting ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...nes are used for making those balls. As a results, they have various densities and are no...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...e professor holds an opposite view. She claim that many of these balls have really si...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol for distinguish the community level. Overall, the ideas mentioned in the list...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, so, thus, well, while, in addition, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87162162162 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40645854565 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543918918919 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1795453245 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1333333333 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422141455279 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1255940567 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776360176115 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224634562681 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228233430296 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.