tpo 27
The lecture and the reading passage discuss because of the cold temperature in many parts of the world between 1350 until 1900CE, the little ice age was appeared. On the one hand the reading clearly state that there were several causes have been proposed that assumed the cause of this change. On the other hand, the lecture refutes that by saying the arguments out of date and do not have any real contribution.
First of all, the reading state that the first cause beyond forming the ice age was melting glaciers that led to increase the cold ocean water that had a direct effect to the Earth's climate. However, the Gulf stream water had an impact on unexpected water like South Africa. So, they cannot take this point.
In addition, the reading makes arguments is that the volcanic eruption cause dark clouds of dust, and that led to block the sunlight to reach the Earth's surface. In other words that decrease the global temperature and formed the Little Ice Age. The lecture counter this point by saying that eruption of volcanic will produce dust but this dust did not report by the people on that time. And the volcanic eruption was not strong enough to release large amount of dust that responsible of decreasing the global temperature.
Lastly, the reading state that the third cause is due to decrease number of people, the forest trees started growing more and led to consumed large amount of carbon dioxide, the earth became cooler. The lecture counter this claims by pointing out that number of trees was not the main contribution to cool the Earth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, lastly, so, third, in addition, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77941176471 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2037244347 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518382352941 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4275980728 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390075676998 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134558964475 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754250797965 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221606190621 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327004959839 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.