Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In recent time, no doubt that the world has developed recently, and due to dynamic changes people are opened to all the world aspects such as economic, social, and political perspectives. However, some people states teachers should not share with the students their social and political opinion. On the other hand, other people see there is no problem with sharing the teachers perspective towards students. From my point of view, I definitely agree with the latter school for a lot of reasons. To substantiate my case this essay will illustrate my reasons to elaborate my preference.
To begin with, because of vast advancement and it is easy to reach any information without limitation, the teachers influence on students in their political and social opinion is not a matter. So, the first and the foremost reason come to my mind is that student could access to a variety of resources to get the information they looking for it. And the vivid example is my youngest brother if he want to know any political information he can open the television or the internet So, he can watch videos or reading the up dated information to create his own perspective toward any issue.
Furthermore, the second vital point should be taken into consideration there is not enough time with the teachers to share there point of view with the students. Simply because they have courses with limited time which should finish it. In deed maybe if the students want to know extended information they will ask their teacher as a valuable recourse, and if the students need to discuss wider and details information they can find the teachers opinions and knowledge worthwhile to them.
All in all, while some people think that teachers should not participate their political and social view with students and it has a negative impact on student. I totally believe with this open world the information are not hidden with teachers, and it is available with different form.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ee there is no problem with sharing the teachers perspective towards students. From my p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...id example is my youngest brother if he want to know any political information he ca...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, so, while, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95440729483 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66508677558 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522796352584 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9183363608 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.384615385 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252584878434 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103158965212 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733339131466 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169697266754 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409873172549 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.