TPO 27 - Integrated Writing Task
According to the passage, three causes explaining the origin of the Little Ice Age are presented. In contrast, the lecturer opposes to these three explanations, saying they are outdated. Now, researchers have found new information about what initiate the event.
First of all, it is thought to be truth that the disrupting of oceans, current to be specific, led to the catastrophic age. Whereas, the professor rejects it, providing convincing alternative. She says that the ocean current in that particular gulf would just affect some places in Europe and North America, while actually the area of New Zealand as well as Africa were all influenced where the spread of current might never reach. As a result, this theory cannot account for the event.
On top of that, dark cloud of dusts erupted by volcanos which can darken the sky and prevent sunlight from coming in is regarded as one of the explanations. Nevertheless, the women in the lecture holds a contradictory viewpoint. She believes that this cause might also had some others visual effects like the greyish snow and so on which might have been documented by human beings. Record of that, however, does not exist.
Thirdly, as the result of the decreasing population of humans, trees spread into areas where humans used to live, which had a consequence of absorbing more carbon dioxide which is used to keep the Earth warm. Nonetheless, the professor disagrees with it. She puts forth that the limited time period of the decline of humans’ population might not provided trees with enough time to absorb such amount of carbon dioxide that the Earth got warm. Humans thrived again just after a short period of declining population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a short period of declining population.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, third, thirdly, well, whereas, while, in contrast, as a result, as well as, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04964539007 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64843055359 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63475177305 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.9526592256 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9333333333 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284807078893 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685612590118 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619232845257 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143104486197 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324167807753 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.