TPO 28
The author believes that Robert E. Peary's claim that he reached northpole in 1909 is legit, and he postulets some poinst to support his belief. The lecturer, however, has the opposite point of view. She explains why the author is not right about his points, and that his points are neither convincing nor sufficient.
First, the author states that National Geographic Society confirmed Peary's claim by conducting a complete investigation. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes the author's statement by asserting that National Geographic Society consisted of Peary's friends and their judgment was biased, provided that they invested a lot in Peary's expedition.
Second, the author proposes that since Tom Avery's recent trip to North Pole took same amount of time as Peary's, his claim seems to be true. On the contrary, the lecturer opposes the author's assertion by contending that Avery's trip differed from Peary's in many ways. Not only his cargo weighted less, since his food was dropped off with airplane, but also the weather conditions under which he travled were more conveinient.
Finally, the author suggests that by measuring the length of the shadows in Peary's photographs, it was confirmend that the Sun was in the same position as it would be in the North Pole. In contrast, the lecturer counters the author's opinion by argueing that photos were rouphly a hundred years old, thereby, shadows in the picture were probably blurred and faded. For this reason, the measurements that took place could not be precise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...he other hand, the lecturer refutes the authors statement by asserting that National Ge...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... the contrary, the lecturer opposes the authors assertion by contending that Averys tri...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... In contrast, the lecturer counters the authors opinion by argueing that photos were ro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.132 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54183870456 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8695328143 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.916666667 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326012855006 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109703617499 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920702604802 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186698014066 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186304046865 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.