Tpo 28- integrated writing
In this set materials, the reading passage state that the claim of Robert about explorer the North Pole is correct and brings some reasons for this claim. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that the National Geographic Society provided a committee group for researching the claim of Robert. This committee recorded some equipment that shown the Robert claims was true; in contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that this committee was not completely objective, because the number of people, who worked in this committee, were the close friends of the Robert. Also, they only investigated for 2 days. Therefore, the research of the national Geography is not correct.
Secondly, the reading argues that Robert as the same as Ellesmere could reach the North in 37 days; conversely, what the lecturer state is different. She believes that the situation of the Ellesmere was different from Robert. Ellesmere did not bring food with him; hence, the speed of Ellesmere was more than the Roberts' speed. Also, the foods were received to the Ellesmere by the airplane every day; hence, he has much less weight than Robert. Furthermore, the weather condition was completely different in this 2 situation. The weather when Robert went to the North was unfavourable. Therefore this claim is rejected.
Finally, although the passage says that measured shadow angles in the Peary’s pictures from his journey confirm that he reached the North Pole, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that Peary took those photos one hundred years ago, and the shadows in the pictures have become blurred. So, even the most accurate technics for measuring the shadow angles in the pictures could not prove his claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 588, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ert went to the North was unfavourable. Therefore this claim is rejected. Finally, a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55176502601 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543918918919 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1609660731 49.2860985944 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318694952836 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908894442775 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677777502225 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175656127308 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468251569732 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.