TPO 28 -Integrated Writing

Essay topics:

TPO 28 -Integrated Writing

The main idea of both the passage and the the talk is about a well-known adventure and arctic explorer, Robert E. Peary. In the text, the author claims Peary reached to North Pole and provides three evidence for support. The lecturer challenges all the viable arguments mentioned in the reading and believes that none of them is convincing.

Firstly, the author states that the National Geographic Society's investigation confirm that Peary reached North Pole. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that investigation which had been done has some flaws. She further explains that Peary's intimate friend was in the committee and national geographic society do not devote a tremendous amount of time for investigation. Therefore, the results was not based on reality, and there objectively conducted.

Moreover, the author asserts that a recent expedition which have been performed by Avery support this claims that it is possible to reach North Pole in 37 days. The speaker, in contrast, points out that some differences are visible between Avery's and Peary's expedition. In addition, she believes that although dogsleds were same for both people, Avery did not carry out a lot of cargo as Peary with his dogsled. Moreover, weather was more favorable when Avery did his expedition.

Eventually, the reading passage holds the opinion that Peary's photographs provide evidence for his claims to have reached the North Pole. On the other hand, the lecture posits that the photographs were not a strong evidence for Peary's claim, since the photographs were not in excellent format and they were faded. Thus, it is not possible to reach a precise conclusion about Pear's claim by the faded photographs.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2019-11-03 HHH 70 Read full essay
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
The main idea of both the passage and the the talk is about a well-known adventure an...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
The main idea of both the passage and the the talk is about a well-known adventure an...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68755072987 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5417913752 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504280103409 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16392341981 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138185945734 0.0662205650399 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2965054004 0.162205337803 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608048467581 0.0443174109184 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.