The reading passage and professor both discuss the authenticity of evidences attirbuted to the claim that Robert E. Peary reached the North Pole. The author contends that Peary reaced the North Pole, stating three conspicuous reasons so as to support. However, the lecturer, having a critical point of view, casts a shadow of doubt on what the author proposes. She states that there is no solid evidence that Peary reached the North Pole and the mentioned evidences in the article are unconvincing, so she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the author claims that according to the conclusion of a committee of the National Geographic Society, Peary indeed reached the North Pole. One the contrary, the professor, not having been convinced, declares that since the committee was not objective, their conclusion cannot be considered valid. She proceeds to state that most of the committee members where colse friends of Peary, and they had contributed a geat deal of money in his expedition. Moreover, the investigation only took two days untile the committee reachd a conclusion, and they did not carefully test Peary's records. Consequently, the conclusion is biased and is not strong.
Second, the author posits that a recent expedition, perfomred by Tom Avery, supports that Peary could reach the North Pole in only 37 days after leaving Ellesmere Island. The lecturer opposes this point, saying that Avery's expedition differed in many aspects from Peary's trip. She sheds some light on this premise, stating that the weight of matterials that they carried were different. Avery did not carry food, and its food was droped by ari plain. Furthermore, Avery traveled in suitable weather conditions, but weather was harsh when Peary traveled.
Finally, the author highlights the fact that the anlysis of photoragphs taken by Peary revealed the fact that he took them in the North Pole. On other hand, the professor states that the photographs prove nothing. To elucidate more on this issue, she explains that scientists analyize photographs' shadows precisely to reach a conclusion. However, Peary's photographs are taken 100 years ago, with primitve cameras. In addition, photos are faded over time, that means shadows are also faded. As a resutl, one cannot use the photographs to determine whether they are authentic or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...Pole, stating three conspicuous reasons so as to support. However, the lecturer, having ...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'as to', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.275058275058 0.261695866417 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.172494172494 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.04662004662 0.0723426182421 64% => OK
Adverbs: 0.048951048951 0.0435111971325 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.032634032634 0.0277247811725 118% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121212121212 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.044289044289 0.0370669169778 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66749352938 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.016317016317 0.0208969081088 78% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.11655011655 0.128158765124 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00699300699301 0.0158828679856 44% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00932400932401 0.0114777025283 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2338.0 1645.83664459 142% => OK
No of words: 376.0 271.125827815 139% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21808510638 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.04852973271 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382978723404 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284574468085 0.287516216867 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210106382979 0.187439937562 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143617021277 0.113142543107 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66749352938 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 145.348785872 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 66.3508169914 53.8517498576 123% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0529801325 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.812707242 49.3711431718 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9 132.220823453 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.878197800319 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 47.2574468085 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.73394495413 1.90840788429 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.754258420101 0.549887131256 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107618490631 0.142949733639 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0666232020197 0.0787303798458 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.515907749961 0.631733273073 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146148564144 0.139662658121 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.292136869342 0.266732575781 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183026994987 0.103435571967 177% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.394493457726 0.414875509568 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.114338754109 0.0530846634433 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.56031152254 0.40443939384 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798652784729 0.0528353158467 151% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.