The article is about the adventurer and arctic explorer Robert E.Peary, which the passage states that he went to visit the North Pole and provides three reasons for support. However, the lecturer says that the information provided in the reading is not convincing and refutes each of the author's points.
First, the article claims that the National Geographic Society assigned a committee to investigate Peary's records to know that he really reached the North pole. However, the professor opposes this point by saying that most of the investigators are his friends. Moreover, the investigation is done for only two days without careful examination. Hence, there is no chance to believe that Peary visited the North pole.
Second, the article posits that Peary has traveled to North pole within 37 days just as Tom Avery who recently traveled the same distance within less time. On the other hand, the professor refutes this point by saying that Avery's ship was lightweight when compared to Peary's because his food was carried by airplane, and he also traveled in good weather conditions.
Third, the text conveys that photographs taken by Peary would suggest that he reached the North Pole because the Surf's position matches the position in the North Pole. Nevertheless, the lecturer says that the photographs are blurred and faded which are not visible clearly. Therefore, it is not confident that Peary reached the North Pole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Peary
...adventurer and arctic explorer Robert E.Peary, which the passage states that he went ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, so, therefore, third, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17167381974 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52084459681 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56652360515 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2875112772 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.545454545 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501672271859 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191437470952 0.0996497079465 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144217283806 0.0662205650399 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295569427792 0.162205337803 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958259469614 0.0443174109184 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.