The writer demonstrates that Robert E.Peary have explored the North pole. He has three reasons to support his claim. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that there is no solid evidence that Peary has reached the North pole and the reasons in support of his claim are not convincing.
Firstly, the writer believes that a committee from the National Geographic Society that was instructed to conduct an investigation on Peary's records concluded that his accounts were persuasive and he infact reached the North pole. However, the speaker says that it is true that this committee has confirmed his exploration but the idea of the committee has not been objective. In fact, the committee members were the friends of Peary and the investigation done in two days is biased and it is not trust worthy.
Second, the writer believes that due to the same experience of Avey which lasted less than 37 days, it can prove that Peary also could have explored the North pole in 37 days. On the other hand, the speaker explains that Avey's experience was conducted in a period with more facilities in his trip like he was given food by airplane and the weather condition has been favourable. As a result, the two experiences are too different to support each other.
Finally, the writer demonstrates that the photographs taken by Peary can prove his claim. He believes the shadows in his photographs makes it possible to calculate the position of sun. However, the speaker believes that the photographs taken by that old fashioned camera can not prove anything. The camera has been so primary and the photographs has some shadows over time. They are somehow blured. Consequently, the shadows cannot be used to determine the position of the sun and the photographs cannot prove that the place in them is North pole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Peary
The writer demonstrates that Robert E.Peary have explored the North pole. He has th...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.250746268657 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.191044776119 0.158904122519 120% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0537313432836 0.0723426182421 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.044776119403 0.0435111971325 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0507462686567 0.0277247811725 183% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113432835821 0.128828473217 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0507462686567 0.0370669169778 137% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61930571878 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0179104477612 0.0208969081088 86% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.134328358209 0.128158765124 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0179104477612 0.0158828679856 113% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00597014925373 0.0114777025283 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1805.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 307.0 271.125827815 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87947882736 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.315960912052 0.374372842146 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.260586319218 0.287516216867 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175895765472 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110749185668 0.113142543107 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61930571878 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475570032573 0.539623497131 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.9319129604 53.8517498576 87% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.4666666667 21.7502111507 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3130196572 49.3711431718 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 132.220823453 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 21.7502111507 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 46.5252985885 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.44791666667 1.90840788429 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.76779926002 0.549887131256 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137964583773 0.142949733639 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.101696967722 0.0787303798458 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.600857269931 0.631733273073 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.191902333769 0.139662658121 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.369707546791 0.266732575781 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162899431856 0.103435571967 157% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.501079372548 0.414875509568 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0267799030658 0.0530846634433 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.622116226755 0.40443939384 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304621817203 0.0528353158467 58% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.62251655629 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 10.2958057395 49% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.