tpo 29 edmontosaurus migrated to south during the winter
The material discusses how did edmontosaurus survive in the North Slope during the winter. Whereas, the reading suggests that they immigrated south, where the weather was warmer, the listening challenges this and states that the hypothesis that edmontosaurus migrated south to survive during the winter are unconvincing.
First, the author mentions that edmontosaurus fed merely on plants, so they had to migrate to find food in winter. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and posits that edmontosaurus did not have to immigrate to survive. The lecturer explains that a hundred years ago, the weather at the North Slope was warmer than today. Furthermore, in the arctic region, the sun shined twenty-four hours at the peak of the summer, which created a good growing condition for plants. According to the lecture, these vegetations died in winter, but edmontosaurus could easily live on these die plants during the winter.
Second, the writer contends that edmontosaurus lived in herds, which supported their migration. On the contrary, the professor refutes this and cits that living in herds did not mean that edmontosaurus migrated. The lecturer points out that animals could live in herds for other purposes, such as extra protection against predators. The speaker says that other animals such as Roseville elk live in herds, but they do not migrate.
Third, the reading states that edmontosaurus were physically able to migrate. Conversely, the professor contradicts this and brings up that adults edmontosaurus had the ability to migrate; however, juvenile ones were not capable to travel a long distance. Moreover, the lecturer adds that if young edmontosaurus migrated with herds, they could slow herds down. The speaker says that adults edmontosaurus could not leave their youngs alone, because they could not live on their own. The professor concludes that adults stayed with their youngs and survived on the North Slope.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...sor contradicts this and brings up that adults edmontosaurus had the ability to migrat...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
... slow herds down. The speaker says that adults edmontosaurus could not leave their you...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, whereas, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34853420195 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75770558716 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521172638436 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 17.0 8.23620309051 206% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4940063572 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287780045112 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970406528757 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370261853538 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179951942815 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414325233633 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.