TPO 29-INTEGRATED
Both the article and the lecturer discuss the hypothesis of the migration of edmontosaurs. On one hand, the article shows evidence in order to support this theory. On the other hand, the professor opposes by stating that the hypothesis is not convincing at all.
First and foremost, the reading attributes the hypothesis to the fact that edmontosaurs are herbivores. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that the edmontosaurs didn't necessarily migrate to find food, which includes plants. He states that the North Slope was much warmer back then and there was, in fact, a good and harmonious condition for plants to grow in the summer. Consequently, when the winter came, edmontosaurs were able to gain nutrients from the abundance of dead plants.
In addition, the article posits that skeletons of edmontosaurs indicate that they lived in herds. Moreover, this behavior was similar to that of modern-day migratory animals so that edmontosaurs must have migrated. Nevertheless, the professor casts doubt on this point by emphasizing that there are many other reasons for edmontosaurs to have lived in herds, such as extra protection. For instance, he says that the Roosevelt Elks, which live in the forests in herds, don't migrate.
Last but not least, the reading indicates that the physical capability of edmontosaurs contributed to their migration. In contrast, the professor rebuts this argument. He argues that only adultery edmontosaurs were that strenuous. That being said, the juvenile ones must have slowed down the herd and the herd had to stay on the cold North Slope since the children edmontosaurs couldn't be left behind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the article and the lecturer discus...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hypothesis is not convincing at all. First and foremost, the reading attribut...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s point by saying that the edmontosaurs didnt necessarily migrate to find food, which...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s from the abundance of dead plants. In addition, the article posits that ske...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ks, which live in the forests in herds, dont migrate. Last but not lea...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the forests in herds, dont migrate. Last but not least, the reading indicate...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...h Slope since the children edmontosaurs couldnt be left behind.
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248322147651 0.261695866417 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.161073825503 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0671140939597 0.0723426182421 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0436241610738 0.0435111971325 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0167785234899 0.0277247811725 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144295302013 0.128828473217 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0335570469799 0.0370669169778 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85736647262 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0302013422819 0.0208969081088 145% => OK
Particles: 0.00335570469799 0.00154638098197 217% => OK
Determiners: 0.127516778523 0.128158765124 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00671140939597 0.0158828679856 42% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010067114094 0.0114777025283 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1692.0 1645.83664459 103% => OK
No of words: 264.0 271.125827815 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.40909090909 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344696969697 0.374372842146 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295454545455 0.287516216867 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.215909090909 0.187439937562 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.174242424242 0.113142543107 154% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85736647262 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57196969697 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 58.3958748846 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.6 21.7502111507 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1222638301 49.3711431718 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 132.220823453 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 21.7502111507 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.39072847682 206% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 47.1454545455 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.92424242424 1.90840788429 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.661633559096 0.549887131256 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0983360334503 0.142949733639 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0510256309262 0.0787303798458 65% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.601887044679 0.631733273073 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127847424857 0.139662658121 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.307405235607 0.266732575781 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100515922885 0.103435571967 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.447533239671 0.414875509568 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0387058914783 0.0530846634433 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.50567013214 0.40443939384 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391992210454 0.0528353158467 74% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 3.1766004415 252% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.