tpo 30
The reading provides three reasons to cast doubt on the story wich claims that Greek people utilized huge mirror to set the Roman`s ships on fire. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents several reasons to refute them all.
First, the author argues that this idea was technologically imposiple for that time and Greek people were not able to such a complex and huge mirror. Conversely, the lecturer cast doubt on this idea by stating that they did not need to bild the huge mirror and they might use the dozen nomber af small mirror to do this job. Greek mathematician were able parabolic creavature of these small copper made mirror and put them in the on assemble to damage to Roman`s ships.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that this mirror was not a practical weapon because it take more than 10 minuet to start the fire in ships by using this method. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that although it would take than 10 minuet to set the woods of these ships on fire, the Roman`s ships were also contained other substances which the fire could spread quickly on them. For instanse, the sticky materials which used for seal the ships could burn in the less than a secound and eventually careat fire in these ships.
Finally, the reading asserts that this weapon do not show the logical improvment from the Greek`s method and in this situations they would probably used flaming arrows. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that Roman`s soldiors were familiar with the flaming arrows and so, Greek people could not use this approach for fighting against them. However, using the mirror, provided an opportunity for Greek people to supprize Roman`s soldiors and set thei ships on the fire. As a result, it was a more effective method for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...r was not a practical weapon because it take more than 10 minuet to start the fire i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: MINUETS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'minute'?
Suggestion: minute
...cal weapon because it take more than 10 minuet to start the fire in ships by using thi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'minuet' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'minuets'.
Suggestion: minuets
...cal weapon because it take more than 10 minuet to start the fire in ships by using thi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: MINUETS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'minute'?
Suggestion: minute
...act that although it would take than 10 minuet to set the woods of these ships on fire...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'minuet' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'minuets'.
Suggestion: minuets
...act that although it would take than 10 minuet to set the woods of these ships on fire...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ent from the Greek's method and in this situations they would probably used fla...
^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
... in this situations they would probably used flaming arrows. On the contrary, the sp...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'so', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248633879781 0.261695866417 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.128415300546 0.158904122519 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0983606557377 0.0723426182421 136% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0491803278689 0.0435111971325 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0300546448087 0.0277247811725 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109289617486 0.128828473217 85% => OK
Participles: 0.016393442623 0.0370669169778 44% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.47557905867 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0327868852459 0.0208969081088 157% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136612021858 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.016393442623 0.0158828679856 103% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00546448087432 0.0114777025283 48% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1858.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 317.0 271.125827815 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86119873817 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.312302839117 0.374372842146 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.220820189274 0.287516216867 77% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.145110410095 0.187439937562 77% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0883280757098 0.113142543107 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47557905867 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492113564669 0.539623497131 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.5978008302 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.4166666667 21.7502111507 121% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7461978521 49.3711431718 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.833333333 132.220823453 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 21.7502111507 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.878197800319 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.39072847682 206% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 48.4986855941 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.80263157895 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.626663605036 0.549887131256 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.192243122129 0.142949733639 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0969923911836 0.0787303798458 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.669071355912 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155990746774 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.327606453414 0.266732575781 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105422195446 0.103435571967 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.454149193193 0.414875509568 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0668537887126 0.0530846634433 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.484005564845 0.40443939384 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150972998102 0.0528353158467 29% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.62251655629 248% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.