tpo33
The reading passage provides three theory for interpreting the applications of the curved stone balls which has been found in different locations of Scotland, However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some reasons to refute them all.
First, the author argues that these objects could have been used as weapon because they contain holes which could be used for swing them. Conversely, the lecturer casts doubt on this idea by stating that the surface of the weapons which have been used in that time was worn out, however, the surface of stone balls has preserved and no damage has been recorded on their surface. So, these objects could not use for this reason.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that the carved stone balls might be utilized as simple object for calculating the weight. In contrast, the lecturer highlights the fact that these objects have been made from different kinds of rock such as sand stone, so, they could not have been used for this purpose because different kind of stones have different density. As a result, although the dimensions of these objects were same, they had different weight and they did not used for the measurement purpose.
Finally, the reading argues that these objects could have indicated the social status of the people of that time. On the contrary, the professor dismisses this issue due to the fact that although some of these carved stones balls were had an elaborate design, lots of them was curved simply and they could not have been used for showing the social level of people on that time. Moreover, the speaker states that people on that time have been buried with their precious objects. But, none of these stone balls were found in the people`s tomb of that age. So, it is unlikely to say that these objects were utilized for illuminating people`s social level or status.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...y had different weight and they did not used for the measurement purpose. Finally, ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240896358543 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.190476190476 0.158904122519 120% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0560224089636 0.0723426182421 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0364145658263 0.0435111971325 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.03081232493 0.0277247811725 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140056022409 0.128828473217 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0868347338936 0.0370669169778 234% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.30692475463 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00840336134454 0.0208969081088 40% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00280112044818 0.00154638098197 181% => OK
Determiners: 0.140056022409 0.128158765124 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0196078431373 0.0158828679856 123% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00840336134454 0.0114777025283 73% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1878.0 1645.83664459 114% => OK
No of words: 318.0 271.125827815 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90566037736 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317610062893 0.374372842146 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.229559748428 0.287516216867 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.141509433962 0.187439937562 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0817610062893 0.113142543107 72% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30692475463 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468553459119 0.539623497131 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.6167214067 53.8517498576 87% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.5 21.7502111507 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4938925645 49.3711431718 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.5 132.220823453 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 21.7502111507 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 0.878197800319 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 49.4559748428 50.5018328374 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.8152173913 1.90840788429 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.650611716114 0.549887131256 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.163898530492 0.142949733639 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.103085583944 0.0787303798458 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.646672408483 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176561717292 0.139662658121 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.317519549097 0.266732575781 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132500911057 0.103435571967 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.427363601288 0.414875509568 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0772173463195 0.0530846634433 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.480380505326 0.40443939384 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056568344994 0.0528353158467 107% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.