tpo 29

Essay topics:

tpo 29

The reading provides three reasons to support the hypothesis which claims that Edmontosurus had been migrated to survive the cold winters of North Pole. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and provides some points to refute them all.
First, the author claims that this kind of dinosaurs needed to eat huge amount of plant to survive and since in the winter, there was no plant in the North Pole, so, they should migrate to south. Conversely, the lecturer casts doubt on this idea by stating that the warmer weather condition of the pole on that time and the 24 hour of son light provided an opportunity for vegetation to grow fast during the summer. So, in the winter these animals was able to eat the dead plant which remained from summer growing time.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that some evidence clearly shows that Edmontosaurus lived in the herd and as like of modern animals that live in the herd they migrated during the winter time. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that living in herd does not show the animals should migrate. Generally speaking, animals choose this kind of life because it can provide several advantages for their life. For example, they can experience extra protection. Moreover, there are animals that lives in the herd and do not migrate during the winter, so, we cannot conclude that all animals how live in the herd change their location during the bad weather conditions.
Finally, the reading assert that this kind of dinosaur was physically capable for long migration toward the south. In the contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that although adult animals was able to migrate, the juvenile Edonotosaurus was not strong enough to pass this long distance. So, they did not migrate during the winter because they could not leave their child alone.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'for example', 'kind of', 'on the contrary']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253602305476 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.149855907781 0.158904122519 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0489913544669 0.0723426182421 68% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0576368876081 0.0435111971325 132% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0317002881844 0.0277247811725 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135446685879 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.014409221902 0.0370669169778 39% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.34102823612 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0317002881844 0.0208969081088 152% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.14121037464 0.128158765124 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0172910662824 0.0158828679856 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014409221902 0.0114777025283 126% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1861.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 315.0 271.125827815 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90793650794 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.349206349206 0.374372842146 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247619047619 0.287516216867 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.139682539683 0.187439937562 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0793650793651 0.113142543107 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34102823612 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 55.4699723339 53.8517498576 103% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.2307692308 21.7502111507 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3903787623 49.3711431718 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.153846154 132.220823453 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 21.7502111507 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.878197800319 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 48.9926739927 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.68674698795 1.90840788429 88% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.639965070159 0.549887131256 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144151143496 0.142949733639 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0829660521769 0.0787303798458 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.624150086318 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.212328691297 0.139662658121 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.312481365326 0.266732575781 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143991254339 0.103435571967 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.480319864727 0.414875509568 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0265729418186 0.0530846634433 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.48282816498 0.40443939384 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424321211859 0.0528353158467 80% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.