The reading and listnenig are arguing over a question whether the Sinosauropteryx had feathers. The passage lists out three reason to prove that the Sinosauropterys had no feathers. On the contrary, the lecturer refuses these reasons and she believes that these reasons are unconvincing.
First, based on the passage, the lines on the bones of the fossils were formed by dcomoposition of the skin fibers after the animal death. In the contrast, the lecturer rebutes this reasion and she states that there are other animals' fossils in this site; None of other animals' fossils have decompistion lines like these lines. In addition, the fossils have been preserved in good condition. As a result, the ash environemnt was a good environement for preservation not decomposition.
Second, the author mentions that the lines are remain of frills not feathers. The lecturer, however, casts doubt this claim and she asserts that the bichemical analysis shows that, there are some materials in the fosills called bricamon. These materials are existed where the feathers exist not where the frills exist. Therefore, the bichemical results prove that these animals have fethers not frills.
Finally, the passage author states that the fethears have two function: flight and regulating the temperature. Nevertheless, the lecturer challenges this idea and she mentions piccup birds which use thier feathers for mating. She claims that the Sinosauropteryx had collurful feathers to show.
All in all, the passage claims the Sinosauropteryx had no feathers and the lines on the their fossils are misprinted. On the contrary, the lecturer chalenges author reasons and she mentions that sinosauropterys had feathers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... the author mentions that the lines are remain of frills not feathers. The lecturer, h...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...pteryx had no feathers and the lines on the their fossils are misprinted. On the contrary...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, in addition, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45660377358 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93154362482 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494339622642 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5143598084 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290636233357 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978156012555 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717570251523 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154802642774 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706792418207 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.