Both the author of the reading and the lecturer discuss about the stranges sounds coming from underwater that used to heard by sailors in Russian submarines that they were patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean between 1960s and 1980s.
First, the reading claims that the sounds were actually coming from male and female ocra whales where they were calling each other. Submarines were able to pick up these braze noises. Nevertheless, the lecturer believes submarines would not be able to hear these noises because the orca whales live in other surface of the ocean that submarines can not hear them.
Second, the reading states that these sounds are caused by giant squid. Whales are very intelligent animals and they could also understand where their sound goes. However, the lecturer says Russian submarines first detected in 1960s and disappeard in 1980s. There is no reason to live only one or two decades for whales.
Third, the reading states that Russians were picking up stray sounds from submarines and the technology of military is well-developed to do this. In contrast, the lecturer says Submarines does not hold up and they do not change their direction because there was no such noise.
In conclusion, the author of the reading surely believes that it was possible and actually real noises that were coming from whales and heard by Russian submarines. However, the lecturer explains there was no sound heard by anyone at that time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
... says Russian submarines first detected in 1960s and disappeard in 1980s. There is no re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
... first detected in 1960s and disappeard in 1980s. There is no reason to live only one or...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, third, well, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10373443983 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38328921702 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50622406639 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1409554363 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470325548621 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17957460189 0.0996497079465 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804265567525 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277569449834 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08049846365 0.0443174109184 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.