TPO 33 integrated
In the reading part, the author contends that the archaeologists found carved stone balls in Scotland and they stats three theories for the purpose of these specific artifacts including; using as a weapon, measuring weight and representing social status. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the reading points by representing the evidence and convincing reasons.
First of all, the writer claims that one of the most possible uses of the carved stone ball was for fighting and protecting the people because it had some holes on its surface that might represent the role of this artifact for fighting. In contrast, the professor mentions that the scientists always find some cracks or broken parts on the surface of the fighting weapons such as arrows but there is no evidence to prove the fact that this specific artifact has broken parts and scientists do not report damages on the surface of this carved stone balls. Therefore, they cannot use as weapons.
Moreover, according to the reading, the carved stone balls could use as the standard measurement tools in ancient time because they were uniform in size and weight. Conversely, the lecturer rejects this notion by pointing the fact that the carved stone balls made from various kinds of rocks such as sandstone and grant core; hence, they are not uniform in mass and weight. Furthermore, the professor gives an example to clarify this concept that the mass of carved stone balls is similar to the feast full of different kinds of rock that are not the same in the weight. For this reason, they cannot use the standard tools for measuring foods.
Ultimately, contrary to the theory in the reading suggesting that using the carved stone balls in the ancient time were the symbols of the high ranked social status because of their elaborated forms, the professor asserts that they do not have elaborated and complicated designs; however, they have very simple forms that might not represent the social status of high ranked people. In addition, she adds that there is any evidence to demonstrate that they buried with high ranked people as their possessions in their graves or toms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: uniform
...tools in ancient time because they were uniform in size and weight. Conversely, the lecturer re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as for, in addition, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 358.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00558659218 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.443551407 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477653631285 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.9246632336 49.2860985944 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.909090909 110.228320801 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5454545455 21.698381199 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4545454545 7.06452816374 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476069816779 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182325805368 0.0996497079465 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110882023829 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283887192057 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431043830048 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.3589403974 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.