There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered animal or plant species. Ways
The government of the countries always have the struggle to pay the tax money for saving and protecting environments or using it for the welfare of people. Many people and residents believe that protecting the animal and plant species that they might naturally extinct in one day is unreasonable and the governments have to pay the budget and taxes on the welfare and convenience of their residents. From my vantage point, governments should pay the tax money to protect the environment because in this way they can make more money by attracting more tourists and prevent the spread of illnesses.
To begin with, by investing and paying more money for the protection of the environment, could attract more tourists. In this way, the governments can make more money and use this money for building more schools, hospitals, and universities in the country. In addition, this money could help the economy of the country to become independent from income of oil. For instance, the Turkey governments decided to invest and use the revenue from taxes and their budget on protecting their unique environment, therefore, they become one the most famous countries that have the high number of tourists and visitors in the year.
In addition, protecting from the environment have many positive consequences and effects on the life and health of humans. Currently, there are many cities and countries that face various kinds of environment issue and crisis like polluted streams, air, and radioactively contaminated soils. These kinds of contaminants have a direct relationship to the abrupt spread of illnesses and human health issues. For instance, in my country, because of less attention of governments to the protection of environment the city of Khuzestan face to plenty of environmental issues including dusty air and polluted streams, therefore, the number of people have the asthma attack or depression increase abruptly.
On the other hand, I believe that in many countries the environmental issues should not be on the priority because they have to overcome more important economic and political issues. Because the first duty of every government of countries is trying their best to make the life of their resident more convenient in some cases they have to overcome the crisis like poverty by paying more budget on providing more job opportunities.
In conclusion, according to all above-mentioned details and examples, it is crystal clear that paying more money to save the environment can make more money for the country. In addition, protecting the environment have a direct effect on the human health and in this way the governments can prevent people from many kinds of mental and physical illnesses. On the other hand, in some cases that the country faces the more important crisis, it is better to pay more money for the welfare of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mportant economic and political issues. Because the first duty of every government of c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in some cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2408.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17849462366 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84982347073 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 748.8 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5463981168 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0625 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109630348713 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492818719307 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476684461427 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074850397504 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514443146132 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.