Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. Address both views
Many people believe that it is necessary for the political figure to keep their people informed in every situation of the country. However, some people prefer to do not know anything about the political decision of governments about the economy, educational system, and foreign policies. I believe that the government has to withhold political information from people in some cases.
To begin with, in many countries vice president have chosen by election system which means the vice president of every country is delegate person from people could have the permission to decide in the emergency situation instead of them. Therefore, in some emergency case like chasing some betrayer to the country and spy they have the permission to withhold information from people because, in this way, they can protect the benefits of the country. However, keeping inform people in this situation could not have positive consequences for people.
Secondly, there are many situations that the vice president has to decide as quickly as possible or the decision need the experienced and knowledgeable team to help the government to choose the best for their country. In this situations, interfering the opinion of the people by keeping them informed could have negative effects on the people like increase the chaotic and intention among people. For instance, for important and sensitive decision for foreign relations and policies, the vice president, and the government have to withhold the information to keep people calm and avoid the stress and intention among them. Therefore, withholding people in some cases have more benefits and positive effects on the people of the country.
On the other hand, one of the most important consequences of keeping people informed is decreasing the number of rumors and intention in the country. For instance, in my country, because government hiding their economic policy from people, the price of exchange many changes every day; Therefore, many businessmen or people who work in stack market face rumors and some wrong information that could lead them to the unpredictable future. In addition, many people cannot decide for their own future because of increasing inflation.
In sum, according to all above-mentioned, it is crystal clear that withholding information from people in secret and the emergency situation could have positive consequences. In addition, in some other cases like foreign policies that need the sensitive decision and knowledgeable team, it is better to withhold people to decrease the tension among people. Nevertheless, withholding people in some cases could have increased the number of rumors that could make people stress out and prevent them from deciding for their future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...o choose the best for their country. In this situations, interfering the opinion of ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ation could have positive consequences. In addition, in some other cases like fore...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in addition, in some cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2317.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38837209302 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7850805873 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402325581395 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 730.8 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8007399015 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.8125 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223769526416 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109980491397 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764803504815 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160863892544 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608758361372 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.