TPO 35
Both the passage and the lecture discuss about an odd handwritten book which is contained many secrets that no one has enabled to translate the script and has perceived the hidden stories. The article brings three theories for revealing the book script; nonetheless, the professor puts those hypothesizes under question according to the professor, none of these applications are convincing.
First, the passage claimed the book was written in a special science; therefor, the text of book is about some complex scientific subjects with regard to a renowned manuscript published in 1550; however, the lecturer doesn't reinforce the idea by emphasizing the fact that scientific books are referenced well known sources; whereas, in this book author didn’t mention any resources.
Next, as the passage illustrated, this book might be a fake magic book which doesn't have any significant meaning; actually, the writer used random alphabet to demonstrate that the book is as a wealthy incredible book; nevertheless, the professor doesn't validate the claim by adding the idea that the shapes are so intricate that we can't accept that they are fake codes
Finally, as the passage expressed, manuscript is a fake modern book that he has decided to sale it as an valuable book if he encountered a deceptive offer. The lecturer rejects this by adding the fact that ink and vellum which are using in this book are almost 400 years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ublished in 1550; however, the lecturer doesnt reinforce the idea by emphasizing the f...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s book might be a fake magic book which doesnt have any significant meaning; actually,...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...dible book; nevertheless, the professor doesnt validate the claim by adding the idea t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hat the shapes are so intricate that we cant accept that they are fake codes Fina...
^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... book that he has decided to sale it as an valuable book if he encountered a decep...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, well, whereas, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17167381974 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76481472844 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600858369099 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 46.0 21.2450331126 217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 150.324449109 49.2860985944 305% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 241.0 110.228320801 219% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 46.6 21.698381199 215% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 19.8 7.06452816374 280% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.2 13.3589403974 196% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.79 53.8541721854 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.2 11.0289183223 192% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.42419426049 123% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.4 10.498013245 194% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.2008830022 187% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.