TPO 35 integrated essay
In the lecture, The professor asserts that no one from the reading could have written the Voynich manuscript. This opposes the article, which states that several theories have been proposed to explain the origin of the Voynich manuscript.
First, the lecturer claims that the person who wrote the Voynich manuscript should have been a powerful person in order to write some thing like this manuscript, however, Ascham was an ordinary physician and a writer, who may not have had the power to write such a thing. This refutes the reading, which states that Ascham has ben identified as a possible author since many plant illustrations in the Voynich manuscript are quite similar to those in ASCHAM'S BOOKS.
Second, although it is true that Edward Kelley was known by tricking people, this do not prove that he was the writer. In fact, people of the sixteenth century were easy to fool because of that he did not have to write such a sophisticated manuscript to gain money. The article, on the other hand, challenges this by mentioning that the manuscript is really fake and has no real meaning because Kelley may have created this book as a magic book to fool the wealthy people.
Finally, the speaker states that, by using modern technology, archeologist were able to date the ealm and ink of the Voynich manuscript to more than four hundred years old. Even though Voynich could have fake the material by using parts of old manuscripts, he could not have found the old ink to make the Voynich manuscript. This prove that it was written several decades before Voynich. This contradicts the text, which states that this manuscript is a modern fake one created by Voynich to sell the book as a mysterious old book.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...een a powerful person in order to write some thing like this manuscript, however, Ascham w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, in fact, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82033898305 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48820024855 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9275194398 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.272727273 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.