TPO 39
The lecture and the reading passage are both about extinction of various species, which allows dinosaur become the common species. While the passage states that there are several reasonable ideas about the elimination of many species. The lecture contradicts these claims and provides evidence to the contrary.
First of all, the author argues that sea level was fluctuating and drop steadily. Thus the animals, who lived there deteriorated. Conversely, the lecture brings up the idea that this reason is highly questionable due to the fact that although changing occurred, and the sea level went down, but most of the animal was capable to withstand this issues because the fluctuation was gradually. If the fluctuating was abrupt, it would be considered that sea level was effective for this problem.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that tremendous effect of climate change. at the end of the Triassic period volcanic activity was enormous, and released huge amounts of sulfur dioxide. On the contrary, the professor plays up the idea that they believe SO2 cause the lower temperature, but it combined with atmospheric water, and appeared in the atmosphere when released by the volcanic activity.
Finally, the reading asserts that asteroids collide with earth, and display huge amount of soil. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue, proposing that this collision was about 2million years before the extinction. Therefore, it shows that they overestimated the effect of asteroids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ows dinosaur become the common species. While the passage states that there are sever...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...evel was fluctuating and drop steadily. Thus the animals, who lived there deteriorat...
^^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...at tremendous effect of climate change. at the end of the Triassic period volcanic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45338983051 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71017889887 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.2181928481 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.