TPO 40
The reading passage claims that it would be impossible for human beings to stay on Venus owing to the extreme and unfavorable conditions, which could not support life. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author embraces the idea that atmospheric pressure on Venus is extremely severe than earth and human beings might crush as well as spacecraft, which crashed during the previous landing. In contrast, the lecturer underlines the idea that scientists can establish a station 50 kilometers above the surface because the pressure at this level is equal to the earth.
The author also asserts that there is no water, oxygen, nitrogen and other useful materials for living on Venus and they have to be imported, which need a hoard of money. Conversely, the professor brings up the idea that Venus contains different compounds, so, these compounds could be used by the chemical process to produce water, oxygen and other necessary materials.
Finally, as set forth by the author there are thick clouds on Venus, which block sunlight. So, without sunlight and solar panels hardly can humans produce electricity. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that 50 kilometers above the surface clouds are not thick enough to inhibit sunlight. Moreover, reflected sunlight on Venus could be used by installing a solar panel and easily produce electricity.
Having scrutinized all the ideas, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there are pieces of evidence having been ignored by the author while the presence of which could strengthen the author's claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich could strengthen the authors claim.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, in contrast, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17407407407 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53120172395 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3079454109 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386366227535 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142726297553 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655281493005 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196357124747 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563327217343 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.