TPO - 40
The lecturer rejects the ideas presented in the reading passage about the problems involved in maintaining permanent human presence on Venus.
The lecturer argues that the first reason, greater atmospheric pressure, would not affect the life of people on Venus if stations are being made above the land surface. The stations would not be contact with the ground, they will be like balloons and thus, the pressure would be much lower than the surface and there would be no danger of getting down. Therefore this technique of establishing the stations above the ground protect the humans from effects of high pressure. The read passage, however, argues that the life on Venus is impossible due to its 90 times greater atmosphere than Earth.
Regarding the second reason, no reservoirs of water on Venus, the lecturer explains that harmful gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen and sulfuric acid can be kept away from the atmosphere by certain chemical processes. Also, the substances required for these chemical processes can be easily available on Venus. In contrast, the reading passage gives the opposite view that life is not possible without due to the presence of harmful gases.
Finally, the lecturer objects the third reason - very little sunlight reaches on Venus surface. He points out that Solar power cells can be applied to in places of clouds which can attract more sunlight and will reflect it to the surface.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... are being made above the land surface. The stations would not be contact with the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ere would be no danger of getting down. Therefore this technique of establishing the stat...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, thus, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11965811966 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42371712624 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606837606838 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9748601051 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.8 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402449783185 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147637083286 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611360920174 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220651162948 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570370960167 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.