Modern computerized voting system Vs traditional voting system ETS sample questions
The lecturer explained why computerized voting system should not replace traditional voting system. He provided following three reasons for his opinion.
First of all, everyone is not familiar with the use of computer. Some people have never even touched computer before, so it is very difficult for them to cast their vote with the help of computer. The fear of technology may cause them to cast wrong vote. So it is not a better option for such kind of people. This directly refutes the reading passage claim that people can vote easily by just a touch of finger.
Secondly, computers can also make mistakes, after all they are programmed by humans. There is always possibility of error in computer based voting system. Furthermore, a big risk in this kind of voting system is that there will be no physical record, so it is almost impossible to retain or recount the votes if any error happens. This undermines the reading passage claim that computers can not make mistakes in counting.
Finally, it is not a good option to fully rely on such technology for the important event of voting. Voting happens only once or some times more than twice and if the technology failed the whole voting event will be a failure. Therefore, It will always be a smart choice to choose a fully trusted method in the important event of voting. Moreover, in banking system technology is being used in daily basis and it is not a once a year use so relying on technology makes sense to them. Again it contradicts what is stated in the reading that it will work for voting system in the same way as it works for banking system.
All in all, everyone is not familiar with the use of technology, computers can also make errors and computer voting system is not fully reliable to use. These are the main reasons so that traditional voting system should not be replaced by computer based voting system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted in the reading that it will work for voting system in the same way as it work...
^^
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... banking system. All in all, everyone is not familiar with the use of technolo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, after all, kind of, first of all, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7250755287 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47348827168 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486404833837 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2611509374 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8888888889 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333452241714 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122259981162 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13792633537 0.0662205650399 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233249407371 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911357761352 0.0443174109184 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.