TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading claims that the writer Chevalier distorted many events in his memior to make his life seem more exciting. However, the lecturer casts doubt on what is presented in the text and refuses every of the reason given in the reading.
First of all, the lecturer claims that even though Chevalier borrowed sums of money, but this does not mean that he was poor. He used to spent large amount of money in parties and gambling. It might also happen that he first sell the things to get money which took time to convert it into money, so he needed to borrow money from someone else. This refutes the passage claim that Chevalier was not wealthy so he needed to borrow money.
Secondly, the lecturer contends that he wrote everything he remembered from his and Voltaire conversations. These conversations were held many years back so it is not possible to remember each detail of the conversation. There are many witnesses who told that Chevalier regularly consulted his notes before writing the memoir. This refutes the passage claim that the conversations he mentioned in his memoir were not accurate.
Finally, the lecturer mentions that other prisoners in the had more powerful friends in the prison in Venice. They could have brided them to escape from the prison but it can not happen in case of Chevaliers. Old government documents are a proof of that soon after the escape of Chevalier, the sealing of the room in which hew was locked was repaired. This is not in agreement with the passage that Chevailer bribed the polotically well-connected friends to escape from the prison.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rer mentions that other prisoners in the had more powerful friends in the prison ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86764705882 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54194909279 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547794117647 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4015305575 49.2860985944 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5714285714 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427932999575 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139171522579 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696562255903 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233129779559 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591861210235 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.