TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task
Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a Chevalier memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir's has become a valuable historical source about European society in the eighteenth century. However, some critics have raised doubts about the accuracy of the memoir. They claim that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the the to make his life seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was.
For example, in his memoir the Chevalier claims that while living in Switzerland, he was very wealthy, and it is known that he spent a great deal of money there on parties and gambling. However, evidence has recently surfaced that the Chevalier borrowed considerable sums of money from a Swiss merchant. Critics thus argue that if the Chevalier had really been very rich, he would not have needed to borrow money.
Critics are also skeptical about the accuracy of the conversations that the Chevalier records in the memoir between himself and the famous writer Voltaire. No one doubts that the Chevalier and Voltaire met and conversed. However, critics complain that the memoir cannot possibly capture these conversations accurately, because it was written many years after the conversations occurred. Critics point out that it is impossible to remember exact phrases from extended the held many years earlier.
Critics have also questioned the memoir's account of the Chevalier's escape from a notorious prison in Venice, Italy. He claims to have escaped the Venetian the by using a piece of metal to make a hole in the ceiling and climbing through the roof. Critics claim that while such a daring escape makes for enjoyable reading, it is more likely that the Chevaliers jailers were bribed to free him. They point out that the Chevalier had a number of politically well-connected friends in Venice who could have offered a bribe.
The reading mainly presents that there are three evidences to prove the coin was not brought by norse to america. however, the listening challenges what are stated in the passage by providing three strong evidences.
Firstly, in the reading, it is said that the location of Marine was so far from norse sites in Canada. they had no relation with each other. In contrast, the listening holds an opposed view that native americans travelled over a thousand kilometers to norse’s settlement and brought back the coin.
Secondly, the passage asserts that there are no other kind of coins found in the norse’s site. that means that norse has no coins in the native america. however, the professor also maintains an opposite opinion that norse didn't stayed at a place forever. When they returned back to Europe, they took away the valuable silver coins.
Finally, the author of reading passage believes that the North understand that the coin is not the most widely accepted form of native American’s currency. On the other hand, the lecturer disagrees it with the point that native americans prefer the valuable or unique items. so the norse can utilize the coin trade with the native americans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...in was not brought by norse to america. however, the listening challenges what are stat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... was so far from norse sites in Canada. they had no relation with each other. In con...
^^^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...passage asserts that there are no other kind of coins found in the norse's site...
^^^^
Line 9, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...f coins found in the norse's site. that means that norse has no coins in the na...
^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...rse has no coins in the native america. however, the professor also maintains an opposi...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...aintains an opposite opinion that norse didnt stayed at a place forever. When they re...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 271, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returned'.
Suggestion: returned
...nt stayed at a place forever. When they returned back to Europe, they took away the valuable ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 281, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ns prefer the valuable or unique items. so the norse can utilize the coin trade wi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.105 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52681123157 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7820369273 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0833333333 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.044828896711 0.272083759551 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199635609348 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0167180389663 0.0662205650399 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0310103972952 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133566986926 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.